A prototype low-cost secondary standard calorimeter for reference dosimetry with ultra-high pulse dose rates.

OBJECTIVES: Ultra-high pulse dose rate modalities present significant dosimetry challenges for ionisation chambers due to significant ion recombination. Conversely, calorimeters are ideally suited to measure high dose, short duration dose deliveries and this work describes a simple calorimeter as an alternative dosemeter for use in the clinic. METHODS: Calorimeters were constructed featuring a disc-shaped core and single sensing thermistor encased in a 3D-printed body shaped like a Roos ionisation chamber. The thermistor forms one arm of a DC Wheatstone bridge, connected to a standard DMM. The bridge-out-of-balance voltage was calibrated in terms of temperature. A graphite-core calorimeter was calibrated in terms of absorbed dose to water (J/kg) in Co-60 and conventional 6, 10 and 15 MV X-rays. Similarly, an aluminium-core calorimeter was calibrated in a conventional 20 MeV electron beam and tested in a research high dose per pulse 6 MeV electron beam. RESULTS: Calorimeters were successfully calibrated in terms of absorbed dose to water in conventional radiotherapy beams at approximately 5 Gy/min with an estimated uncertainty of ±2-2.5% (k = 2), and performed similarly in a 6 MeV electron beam delivering approximately 180 Gy/s. CONCLUSIONS: A simple, low-cost calorimeter traceably calibrated to existing primary standards of absorbed dose could be used as a secondary standard for dosimetry for ultra-high pulse dose rates in the clinic. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Secondary standard calorimeters for routine measurements are not available commercially; this work presents the basis of a simple, low-cost solution for reference dosimetry for ultra-high pulse dose rate beams.

Multi-institutional dosimetric delivery assessment of intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery on different treatment platforms.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Assessment of dosimetric accuracy of radiosurgery on different treatment platforms. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty-three single fraction treatment plans were assessed at thirty centres using an anthropomorphic head phantom with target and brainstem structures. The target being a single irregular shaped target, ~8 cc, 10 mm from the brainstem. The phantom was "immobilised", scanned, planned and treated following the local protocols. EBT-XD films and alanine pellets were used to measure absolute dose, inside both the target and the brainstem, and compared with TPS predicted dose distributions. RESULTS: PTV alanine measurements from gantry-based linacs showed a median percentage difference to the TPS of 0.65%. Cyberknife (CK) had the highest median difference of 2.3% in comparison to the other platforms. GammaKnife (GK) showed the smallest median of 0.3%. Similar trends were observed in the OAR with alanine measurements showing median percentage differences of1.1%, 2.0% and 0.4%, for gantry-based linacs, CK and GK respectively. All platforms showed comparable gamma passing rates between axial and sagittal films. CONCLUSIONS: This comparison has highlighted the dosimetric variation between measured and TPS calculated dose for each delivery platform. The results suggest that clinically acceptable agreement with the predicted dose distributions is achievable by all treatment delivery systems.

Adaptation and validation of a commercial head phantom for cranial radiosurgery dosimetry end-to-end audit.

OBJECTIVE: To adapt and validate an anthropomorphic head phantom for use in a cranial radiosurgery audit. METHODS: Two bespoke inserts were produced for the phantom: one for providing the target and organ at risk for delineation and the other for performing dose measurements. The inserts were tested to assess their positional accuracy. A basic treatment plan dose verification with an ionization chamber was performed to establish a baseline accuracy for the phantom and beam model. The phantom and inserts were then used to perform dose verification measurements of a radiosurgery plan. The dose was measured with alanine pellets, EBT extended dose film and a plastic scintillation detector (PSD). RESULTS: Both inserts showed reproducible positioning (±0.5 mm) and good positional agreement between them (±0.6 mm). The basic treatment plan measurements showed agreement to the treatment planning system (TPS) within 0.5%. Repeated film measurements showed consistent gamma passing rates with good agreement to the TPS. For 2%-2 mm global gamma, the mean passing rate was 96.7% and the variation in passing rates did not exceed 2.1%. The alanine pellets and PSD showed good agreement with the TPS (-0.1% and 0.3% dose difference in the target) and good agreement with each other (within 1%). CONCLUSION: The adaptations to the phantom showed acceptable accuracies. The presence of alanine and PSD do not affect film measurements significantly, enabling simultaneous measurements by all three detectors. Advances in knowledge: A novel method for thorough end-to-end test of radiosurgery, with capability to incorporate all steps of the clinical pathway in a time-efficient and reproducible manner, suitable for a national audit.

Radiotherapy dosimetry audit: three decades of improving standards and accuracy in UK clinical practice and trials.

Dosimetry audit plays an important role in the development and safety of radiotherapy. National and large scale audits are able to set, maintain and improve standards, as well as having the potential to identify issues which may cause harm to patients. They can support implementation of complex techniques and can facilitate awareness and understanding of any issues which may exist by benchmarking centres with similar equipment. This review examines the development of dosimetry audit in the UK over the past 30 years, including the involvement of the UK in international audits. A summary of audit results is given, with an overview of methodologies employed and lessons learnt. Recent and forthcoming more complex audits are considered, with a focus on future needs including the arrival of proton therapy in the UK and other advanced techniques such as four-dimensional radiotherapy delivery and verification, stereotactic radiotherapy and MR linear accelerators. The work of the main quality assurance and auditing bodies is discussed, including how they are working together to streamline audit and to ensure that all radiotherapy centres are involved. Undertaking regular external audit motivates centres to modernize and develop techniques and provides assurance, not only that radiotherapy is planned and delivered accurately but also that the patient dose delivered is as prescribed.

Inter-departmental dosimetry audits - development of methods and lessons learned.

External dosimetry audits give confidence in the safe and accurate delivery of radiotherapy. In the United Kingdom, such audits have been performed for almost 30 years. From the start, they included clinically relevant conditions, as well as reference machine output. Recently, national audits have tested new or complex techniques, but these methods are then used in regional audits by a peer-to-peer approach. This local approach builds up the radiotherapy community, facilitates communication, and brings synergy to medical physics.

A methodology for dosimetry audit of rotational radiotherapy using a commercial detector array.

PURPOSE: To develop a methodology for the use of a commercial detector array in dosimetry audits of rotational radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The methodology was developed as part of the development of a national audit of rotational radiotherapy. Ten cancer centres were asked to create a rotational radiotherapy treatment plan for a three-dimensional treatment-planning-system (3DTPS) test and audited. Phantom measurements using a commercial 2D ionisation chamber (IC) array were compared with measurements using 0.125 cm(3) IC, Gafchromic film and alanine pellets in the same plane. Relative and absolute gamma index (γ) comparisons were made for Gafchromic film and 2D-Array planes, respectively. RESULTS: Comparisons between individual detectors within the 2D-Array against the corresponding IC and alanine measurement showed a statistically significant concordance correlation coefficient (both ρc>0.998, p<0.001) with mean difference of -1.1 ± 1.1% and -0.8 ± 1.1%, respectively, in a high dose PTV. In the γ comparison between the 2D-Array and film it was that the 2D-Array was more likely to fail planes where there was a dose discrepancy due to the absolute analysis performed. CONCLUSIONS: It has been found that using a commercial detector array for a dosimetry audit of rotational radiotherapy is suitable in place of standard systems of dosimetry.